Page 19 - AssessmentReport
P. 19

determining whether the government’s acquisitions comply with the statute and the
               Fourth Amendment.

               Similarly, a retrospective sample of U.S. person query terms and supporting documentation
               will allow the FISC to conduct a fuller review of the government’s minimization procedures.
               Such a sample could allow greater insight into the methods by which information gathered
               under Section 702 is being utilized, and whether those methods are consistent with the
               minimization procedures. While U.S. person queries by the NSA and CIA are already subject
               to rigorous executive branch oversight (with the exception of metadata queries at the CIA),
               supplying this additional information to the FISC could help guide the court by highlighting
               whether the minimization procedures are being followed and whether changes to those
               procedures are needed.

               Discussion of Status:

                The government proposed possible sampling methodologies to the FISC, and provided the
               FISC’s legal staff as well as the court’s judges with a briefing during which they reviewed a
               sample of tasking sheets and a sample of U.S. person queries. In its Memorandum Opinion
               and Order reauthorizing the Section 702 program, the court referred to this
               recommendation by the Board, and noted:

                       The government adopted this recommendation, and in January 2015 it provided the
                       Court’s legal staff with an extensive briefing on its oversight activities, as well as
                       sample tasking sheets and query terms.  The government offered to make additional
                       tasking sheets and query terms available to the Court.  At the Court’s request, the
                       government provided an overview of its Section 702 oversight efforts to all of the
                       Court’s judges in May 2015, which included a review of sample tasking sheets. These
                       briefings confirmed the Court’s earlier understanding that the government’s
                       oversight efforts with respect to Section 702 collection are robust.

               In considering the recertification of the Section 702 program, the FISC did not make any
               decision on a sampling methodology. To date the Court has not requested additional
               tasking sheets or queries beyond what was provided in January and May 2015.

               Recommendation 5:  Create and Submit to the FISC a Single Consolidated
               Document Describing All Significant Rules Governing Operation of the

               Section 702 Program

               Status:

               Implemented by the executive branch








                                                             19
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24